Tech Teacher

Author/Source: Dale Fox / Tom’s Guide See the full link here

Takeaway

This article compares two artificial intelligence models, Grok-4.1 and Claude 4.5 Sonnet, by looking at their scores on various tests. You will learn which AI model performed better in different areas like math, coding, and understanding information.

---

Technical Subject Understandability

Beginner

---

Analogy/Comparison

Comparing these AI models is like watching two students take a report card full of different subject tests to see who gets higher grades in each class.

---

Why It Matters

Knowing which AI model performs better helps people choose the right tool for their needs, whether it’s for answering questions, writing code, or solving math problems. For example, if you need help with coding, Grok 4.1’s higher score on the HumanEval test suggests it might be a more helpful tool for that task.

---

Related Terms

MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, MATH, AR-C, HellaSwag, GPQA, DROP, BIG-Bench Hard, WMT 2023. Jargon Conversion: MMLU is a test for general knowledge and problem-solving. HumanEval is a test that checks an AI’s ability to write computer code. GSM8K is a test for solving math word problems. MATH is a test for advanced math questions. AR-C is a test that checks common sense thinking. HellaSwag is a test for common sense in tricky situations. GPQA is a test that asks very hard general questions. DROP is a test to see how well an AI understands what it reads. BIG-Bench Hard is a test for extremely difficult problems. WMT 2023 is a test to see how well an AI can translate different languages.